

Macs and PCs have leapfrogged each other in processor performance from the very beginning.
WHY MAC IS BETTER THAN PC SOFTWARE
(Our own "Apples to Apples" benchmarks clearly show this.) This is obviously a situation that can be rectified through better programming.īut even if it were not a software issue and purely a processor issue, it still wouldn't matter. The issue of which processor can render which file more quickly is an incredibly minor one, especially if you're only talking about a very small difference and that much of this difference has to do with a particular program's inability to use multiple processors efficiently on the Mac, as is the case with After Effects and Photoshop. I simply do not equate that company with my computer platform.īut regardless of my feelings about Apple and Motorola, I am, to the core, a Macintosh devotee-and with good reasons. So, as far as I'm concerned, Motorola could go out of business tomorrow, and it wouldn't affect me in the least.
WHY MAC IS BETTER THAN PC PC
To me, a Mac would still be a Mac even if it were running on an AMD processor, just as a Mac is still a Mac even though it's integrated several PC technologies, like PCI, AGP, USB, ATA/IDE and PC100 SDRAM.

Personally, I don't care what chip my Mac runs on, as long as I get some decent performance out of it, which the G4 does provide, even if it's not the same performance as an Intel or AMD chip-at present. They make the G4 chip that ships in Macintosh computers. In fact, I've written several articles chastising Jobs & Co. Mac initiative is a good recent example.) And I'm not going to sit here and defend everything the company does. Apple, like all companies, can make some incredibly ridiculous moves. And this has led some to conclude that Windows-based PCs are, therefore, better machines and that the Mac is now obsolete. We've been witness, of late, to new benchmark studies showing that current-generation AMD and Intel chips are faster than the current-generation chips found in Macintosh computers in real-world software tests running After Effects and Photoshop, not just clock speed. There's a fallacious line of reasoning that says that the faster a machine is, the better.
